Message Replied To ==========
no other team/fan base? you have any data to support that statement? I just
find it interesting that a player of a program who hasnt done jack in 50 years deems fit to run his mouth.
==============================
walled Johnny M. and the AM&N offense, when any Aggie expression of confidence so upset the gumps. We chose to link a summary of the study at Gasland because they love links so much there. I think that was Thursday or Friday before the tilt in Collitch Station. Gee, I hope the link hasn't scrolled off. In case it has, I'll share a bit below. Our paper has been submitted for publication, however, and we will keep the data in-house until the review/pub decision process is over.
We were able to reject the null hypothesis of all FBS population mean obsessions with lame bulletin board material being equal at an impressive 0.005 level. The test for normality of each population was not as strong, but we were pleasantly surprised that the ANOVA assumption of equal population variances was well supported. A Duncan Renaldo range test showed that UAT and Tejas were significantly higher than the rest. We were fortunate that we were able to obtain additional UAT and Tejas samples from www.collegefootballresearch.com/ that led to the conclusion (at the 0.05 level) that the UAT mean exceeds the Tejas mean. (This was a two-sample t test wih 59 DOF and test assumptions were supported by appropriate GOF and equal variance tests. No need to consider nonparametric tests.)
We submitted to JASA and TI and are of course hoping for a favorable peer review over the next few months. We're confident. Oops, there's that word again.
