Message Replied To ==========
Resort to name-calling and stuff when you can't deal with the facts...
...there is is, plain as day...Enjoy the NCAA memo coming out tomorrow or Thursday from Memphis and the bottom of the SEC West...Thanks! At least now we're no longer the only SEC West team beaten by Dan Mullen...==============================
Your brain seems to work poorly. You seem to have trouble grasping basic concepts. You are often inappopropriate and seem confused by context.
But, in case you were wondering, and because I so love futility, here is the difference between those plays.
First, the Vandy play was an actual football play, albeit a penalty (which was called). The Vandy guy tackled a receiver who caught the ball, but he tackled him too high. The penalty continued SC's game winning drive. By contrast the Ole Miss player was not penalized, even though his play is illegal. I don't always like the rule, but it is illegal to strike another player with the crown of your helmet in the head while making a tackle. It used to be legal, but a helmet to helmet hit by Auburn's Junior Rosegreen on Georgia's Reggie Brown was the impetus of the change, in fact. I saw it in person. It was scary. The endzone view of the Ole Miss play shows your number 7 hitting the UTEP guy in the facemask with the crown of his hat ( shortly after the ball passed). He could have easily aimed lower, but he launched. You are probably too busy masturbating to the Landshark music by then to notice, but I digress. The refs didn't call it. They missed it, so the SEC office has to do something. Whether the penalty is appropriate is a separate subject. I assume they realized this guy was valuable to your weak ass program and suspended him, so he wouldn't get hurt when you play a real team like Texas.
So there are some facts and inferences therefrom. I doubt you will understand them because you are an imbecile.
