...WAS THAT DYE COULDN'T WIN THE "BIG GAME." DYE TOOK A PROGRAM THAT HAD ONE S.E.C. CHAMPIONSHIP IN THE PREVIOUS 25 YEARS. HE THEN WON 4 S.E.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS IN A 6 YEAR PERIOD. HE DID WIN THE "BIG GAME" BECAUSE EVERY GAME IN THE CONFERENCE IS BIG WHEN YOU WIN THE CROWN.
TUBERVILLE'S 13-0 CAMPAIGN IN 2004 DEBUNKS THE ENTIRE MYTH BUT SETTING ASIDE THE UNDEFEATED SEASON, TUBERVILLE IS 9-1 AGAINST TOP TEN TEAMS. WHY ISN'T THIS TAG-LINE GIVEN TO THE COACHES THAT TUBERVILLE BEAT?
TUBERVILLE IS 2-0 AGAINST URBAN. WHY ISN'T THIS TAG LINE GIVEN TO URBAN? WHY ISN'T THIS TAG GIVEN TO THE OTHER FOUR OR FIVE TOP TEN TEAMS WHO LOST UPSETS TO UNDERDOGS THIS PAST WEEKEND?
PETE CARROLL HAS LOST A GAME EVERY YEAR OF HIS COACHING TENURE AT U.S.C. MOST NOTABLY TO OREGON AND CAL LAST YEAR AND AGAINST TEXAS IN 2005.
WHY ISN'T THIS MYTH LAID ON THESE COACH'S DOORSTEP? BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN ANOINTED BY THE TALKING HEADS AT ESPN AND MYTH IS ONCE AGAIN REGURGITATED AS FACT.
CONTEXT ADDED BY ADMIN:
END OF CONTEXT
...WAS THAT DYE COULDN'T WIN THE "BIG GAME." DYE TOOK A PROGRAM THAT HAD ONE S.E.C. CHAMPIONSHIP IN THE PREVIOUS 25 YEARS. HE THEN WON 4 S.E.C. CHAMPIONSHIPS IN A 6 YEAR PERIOD. HE DID WIN THE "BIG GAME" BECAUSE EVERY GAME IN THE CONFERENCE IS BIG WHEN YOU WIN THE CROWN.
TUBERVILLE'S 13-0 CAMPAIGN IN 2004 DEBUNKS THE ENTIRE MYTH BUT SETTING ASIDE THE UNDEFEATED SEASON, TUBERVILLE IS 9-1 AGAINST TOP TEN TEAMS. WHY ISN'T THIS TAG-LINE GIVEN TO THE COACHES THAT TUBERVILLE BEAT?
TUBERVILLE IS 2-0 AGAINST URBAN. WHY ISN'T THIS TAG LINE GIVEN TO URBAN? WHY ISN'T THIS TAG GIVEN TO THE OTHER FOUR OR FIVE TOP TEN TEAMS WHO LOST UPSETS TO UNDERDOGS THIS PAST WEEKEND?
PETE CARROLL HAS LOST A GAME EVERY YEAR OF HIS COACHING TENURE AT U.S.C. MOST NOTABLY TO OREGON AND CAL LAST YEAR AND AGAINST TEXAS IN 2005.
WHY ISN'T THIS MYTH LAID ON THESE COACH'S DOORSTEP? BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN ANOINTED BY THE TALKING HEADS AT ESPN AND MYTH IS ONCE AGAIN REGURGITATED AS FACT.
THE HEAD COACH,
AND THE Q.B., 
TO MAKE ALL THINGS RIGHT IN THE LAND OF OZ.
